CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8] — Page 226

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

Francis' objection had been raised,

but Lord Justice Hely Hutchinson who delivered the judgment stated with the appeal being argued that he had an impression that the court had not jurisdiction to make an order.

As laid down in Ordinance 2 of 1871, the Privy Council decided that, pointed out an

Extradition Treaty between England and China in the ordinary sense of the word, we would call the attention of His Excellency to the fact that there are two Articles, No 21 and 23 which refer to the criminal and civil jurisdiction of the British subjects - piracy jure gentium was not an extradition case.

It became unnecessary as Ordinance 2 of 1850 was in force and nothing is said about it in the judgment. With reference to the Tientsin Treaty which is not necessary to decide whether we have above pointed out this, it was considered when dealing with China that the law of extraterritoriality is in force as to Europeans to induce clauses which are not to be found as far as we are aware in any Treaties in force.

THE

Edit History

2026-05-25 17:52:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Francis' objection had been raised, but Lord Justice Hely Hutchinson who delivered the judgment stated with the appeal being argued that he had an impression that the court had not jurisdiction to make an order. As laid down in Ordinance 2 of 1871, the Privy Council decided that, pointed out an Extradition Treaty between England and China in the ordinary sense of the word, we would call the attention of His Excellency to the fact that there are two Articles, No 21 and 23 which refer to the criminal and civil jurisdiction of the British subjects - piracy jure gentium was not an extradition case. It became unnecessary as Ordinance 2 of 1850 was in force and nothing is said about it in the judgment. With reference to the Tientsin Treaty which is not necessary to decide whether we have above pointed out this, it was considered when dealing with China that the law of extraterritoriality is in force as to Europeans to induce clauses which are not to be found as far as we are aware in any Treaties in force. THE
Baseline (Original)
Francis objection head been raised. ཨི་མ a but Lord Justice thellish who delivered the Lum judgment stated with the appeal being augned impression that that he had brown bolong has not purisdiction to make endhi As low in Ordinance 2 of 1871. the Privy Cornel decided that, hointed out an 221 Extradition Treaty between England and blina in the ordinary sense of call the worde we would salt, the attention of his Excellency, to the fact that there two Enticle No 21 and 23 which refer to the criminal and civil brunts in daytrocy Jurisdictio of the ver bleinere subjects -piracy jrore gentium was not an Extradation cinne it became unecessary Ordinance 2 of 1850 was in force and nothing is said about it in the judgment. With reference to the Tientsin Treaty which is not to decide whether ww have above -pointed we e front this out sherig necessary that it was considered dealing with china when the .... law of exterritoriality is insert in force as to Europeans to induct clauses which are not to be found as for Ave are aware in amy Treaties in THE
2026-05-25 17:52:52 · Baseline
View content

Francis objection head been raised.

ཨི་མ

a

but Lord Justice thellish who delivered

the

Lum

judgment stated with the appeal

being augned impression that

that he had

brown bolong

has not purisdiction to make endhi

As

low in Ordinance 2 of 1871. the Privy Cornel decided that,

hointed out an

221

Extradition Treaty

between England and blina in the

ordinary sense of

call

the

worde

we would

salt, the attention of his Excellency,

to the fact that there

two Enticle

No 21 and 23 which refer to the

criminal and civil

brunts in daytrocy

Jurisdictio of the

ver bleinere subjects

-piracy jrore gentium

was not an

Extradation cinne it became

unecessary Ordinance 2 of 1850 was in force and nothing is said about it in the judgment. With reference to the Tientsin Treaty which is not

to decide whether

ww

have above

-pointed

we

e front this out

sherig

necessary

that it

was considered

dealing with china when the

....

law of exterritoriality is

insert

in

force as to Europeans to induct clauses

which

are not to be found as for

Ave

are

aware in

amy

Treaties in

THE

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.